Sensor-scheduling simulation of disparate sensors for Space Situational Awareness

The art and science of space situational awareness (SSA) has been practised and developed from the time of Sputnik. However, recent developments, such as the accelerating pace of satellite launch, the proliferation of launch capable agencies, both commercial and sovereign, and recent well-publicised collisions involving man-made space objects, has further magnified the importance of timely and accurate SSA. The United States Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) operates the Space Surveillance Network (SSN), a global network of sensors tasked with maintaining SSA. The rapidly increasing number of resident space objects will require commensurate improvements in the SSN. Sensors are scarce resources that must be scheduled judiciously to obtain measurements of maximum utility. Improvements in sensor scheduling and fusion, can serve to reduce the number of additional sensors that may be required. Recently, Hill et al. [1] have proposed and developed a simulation environment named TASMAN (Tasking Autonomous Sensors in a Multiple Application Network) to enable testing of alternative scheduling strategies within a simulated multi-sensor, multi-target environment. TASMAN simulates a high-fidelity, hardware-in-the-loop system by running multiple machines with different roles in parallel. At present, TASMAN is limited to simulations involving electro-optic sensors. Its high fidelity is at once a feature and a limitation, since supercomputing is required to run simulations of appreciable scale. In this paper, we describe an alternative, modular and scalable SSA simulation system that can extend the work of Hill et al with reduced complexity, albeit also with reduced fidelity. The tool has been developed in MATLAB and therefore can be run on a very wide range of computing platforms. It can also make use of MATLAB’s parallel processing capabilities to obtain considerable speed-up. The speed and flexibility so obtained can be used to quickly test scheduling algorithms even with a relatively large number of space objects. We further describe an application of the tool by exploring how the relative mixture of electro-optical and radar sensors can impact the scheduling, fusion and achievable accuracy of an SSA system. By varying the mixture of sensor types, we are able to characterise the main advantages and disadvantages of each configuration.